The NIR Community from ASD Inc., a Malvern Panalytical company

Ground Truthing and Calibration of UASs

August 30, 2017


Ground truthing and calibration of imagery obtained using unmanned aerial systems (UASs - also known as UAVs or drones)

The use of unmanned aerial systems (UASs) is growing rapidly in the field of remote sensing as a new and versatile tool for data acquisition in areas such as agricultural resource monitoring, soil characterization, and environmental monitoring. Specific examples where sensors mounted on UASs have provided useful results include water stress detection in agricultural crops, plant biomass and nitrogen content in crops and grasses, yield forecasting for crops like wheat and rice, rangeland management, leaf area index, NDVI and vineyard management.

UASs fill the gap between satellite imagery and ground-based spectroradiometers. One of the main benefits is that their low operating height enables the generation of very high spatial resolution imagery data for small areas, with some systems reaching resolutions of 1 cm per pixel. UASs also can have a shorter revisit period than satellite platforms and offer high temporal resolution and increased maneuverability to allow access to previously inaccessible areas or hazardous environments. Another benefit of UASs is the low operational costs compared with other methods. 

Spectral imagery collected from a sensor mounted on a UAS requires similar methods as satellite and fixed wing airborne sensors, in terms of ground truthing activities, meaning that radiometric calibration is necessary for the extraction of quantitative data from the image pixels. Factors that affect the data include weather conditions at the time of imaging and the characteristics of the sensor being used however unlike satellite and fixed wing aerial sensors, given that UASs are flown at relatively low heights (30 meters for example) many studies suggest that there are few atmospheric effects on UASs. This can really simplify the workflow for correcting the imagery data provided by the UAS-mounted spectral imager.

As with all remote sensing activities, good quantitative data requires that the sensors are characterized and validated against reference measurements from ground based spectroradiometers such as the ASD FieldSpec® 4 and HandHeld 2 instruments. This is required in markets like precision agriculture that require thorough calibration procedures, high quality characterization and works well in the field. Same for satellite and fixed wing airborne imagery. Using an ASD FieldSpec 4 or a HandHeld 2 to collect field measurements is the best method to create a calibration model using an empirical line approach to correct the data.

A FieldSpec or HandHeld spectroradiometer is used to collect spectra on the ground to provide a measure of true surface reflectance for the ground-based targets selected by the user. Then the spectra typically then needs to be downsampled to match the wavelength ranges of the imaging camera system being used.

An example of this is shown in the results from a study by Del Pozo et al (2014) that compares the spectrum collected by a FieldSpec 3 (the green line) versus the data collected in a multispectral imager with 6 bands mounted on a drone (the orange squares), for a pine tree after applying calibration coefficients to correct the imagery data derived from ground truth data provided by a HandHeld 2 instrument.

 Blog_Ground Truthing and Calibration of UASs_ChartPic-1.jpg

The sampling method for ground truthing with a FieldSpec or HandHeld varies from study to study, but generally several reference spectra are collected for each ground based target (10 samples is often a good number). The spectra from the FieldSpec or HandHeld are in ASD file formats that can either be ingested into a remote sensing package if supported or can be converted to an ASCII format to before ingesting. Once in a remote sensing analysis software package, the data files need to be  downsampled to match the wavelength ranges (or bands) of the imaging sensor and then an empirical line method can then be applied to establish band-specific calibration coefficients. The coefficients are then applied to each target material using the empirical line method on a pixel by pixel basis. This allows the digital numbers of the image pixels to be converted to surface reflectance.

There are a number of tools that can be used to process the data in this workflow. For example, ENVI® software from Harris Geospatial provides easy-to-use toolkits for ingesting ASD files directly, and resampling the spectroradiometer data to match the image data. 

Calibration of spectral sensors is a key component of getting good quantitative data.


If you would like more information, please click below to contact our remote sensing specialist!

  Contact Our Expert


Back to List

Sign Up for Our Blog

Latest Posts

Posts by Category

see all